Thursday, January 16, 2020

[CASE SUMMARY] EARLE B.BARNES v. CHARLES LEE ANDREWS (US District Court for the Southern District of New York 298 F. 614)


1924
 
Ponente: Learned Hand, J.


Topic: Duties of Directors and Controlling Stockholders

SUMMARY

Barnes, as receiver of Liberty Starters Corp., filed an action against Andrews, a director of the corporation, for misprision of office. The complaint alleged that Andrews failed to give adequate attention to the affairs of the corporation, resulting in losses and depletion of funds. 

The Court found Andrews guilty of misprision of office for relying solely on the President's updates on the status of the corporation. Despite this, Andrews could not be held liable for the losses suffered by the corporation because Barnes failed to adequately show that the performance of Andrew's duties would have completely avoided said losses. 

When a business fails from general mismanagement, business incapacity, or bad judgment, it is difficult to conjecture that a single director could turn the company around, or how much dollar he could have saved had he acted properly. 

DOCTRINE

A business can fail for many reasons. Thus, imposition of a liability depends on proof of causation.

See full case digest/case brief HERE.